IBM MQ vs. Software AG Apama

As of March 2019, IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Queue with 63 reviews vs Software AG Apama which is ranked 1st in CEP. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "I like that the ability to add applications to it is simple". IBM MQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and Apache Kafka. Software AG Apama is most compared with TIBCO Streambase CEP, IBM MQ and Oracle BAM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM MQ Logo
29,770 views|19,380 comparisons
Software AG Apama Logo
906 views|372 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Software AG Apama? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue. Updated: February 2019.
325,421 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
To implement such an IBM solution, a company has to pay a lot in term of licensing and consultancy. A pricing model might be a better option.In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side.IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly.99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best.Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run.I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it.Use the new and lightweight version (Liberty) to lower licensing costs. It is also easier to upgrade/maintain.IBM MQ has a flexible license model based on the Processor Value Unit (PVU) and I recommend it.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue solutions are best for your needs.
325,421 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 13 in Message Queue
Views
29,770
Comparisons
19,380
Reviews
63
Followers
793
Avg. Rating
8.6
1st
out of 9 in CEP
Views
906
Comparisons
372
Reviews
0
Followers
99
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere MQProgress Apama
Learn
IBM
Software AG
Overview

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

Enables both sell-side and buy-side traders to leverage proprietary trading strategies.
Offer
Learn more about IBM MQ
Learn more about Software AG Apama
Sample Customers
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp CorporationOkasan Online Securities
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer13%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company17%
Retailer12%
Engineering Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise88%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise86%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue. Updated: February 2019.
325,421 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Message Queue reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email