Anonymous UserSr. Director, Software Engineering Director at a healthcare company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay."
"Pricing can vary depending on the size of the organization and how contracts are negotiated."
"IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."
"It is expensive to onboard additional users."
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 2nd in Application Requirements Management with 13 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 14th in Application Requirements Management. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 7.4, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes "Has given us a means for improving the way we proceed through solution development". On the other hand, IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Jira, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, PTC Integrity Requirements Connector and Jama Connect, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with froglogic Squish.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.