Compare IBM Rational Focal Point vs. PTC Integrity Requirements Connector
IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 16th in Application Requirements Management while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with JIRA, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, JIRA and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
Ranking  | |
Views 153 Comparisons 96 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 692 Comparisons 591 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: February 2020. 396,781 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 100% of the time. |  Compared 72% of the time. Compared 14% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Rational Focal Point | PTC IRC |
Learn | |
| IBM | PTC |
Overview | |
| IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects. | PTC Integrity Requirements Connector (IRC) enables an effective and efficient method to synchronize requirements across projects, departments and enterprise boundaries. Deploying IRC across an organization ensures that requirements are communicated, processed, easily acted upon and contribute to the success of your projects. This whitepaper explains the primary reasons why IRC is indispensable in today’s world of distributed product development. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Rational Focal Point | Learn more about PTC Integrity Requirements Connector |
Sample Customers | |
| SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank | Cummins, Continental |
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: February 2020.
396,781 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also IBM Rational Focal Point Reviews, PTC Integrity Requirements Connector Reviews, and our list of Best Application Requirements Management Companies.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.