Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Plutora Test Environment Management

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews while Plutora Test Environment Management is ranked 26th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while Plutora Test Environment Management is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". On the other hand, IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise, TestRail by Gurock, TFS and Tricentis qTest, whereas Plutora Test Environment Management is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2020.
425,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
425,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
1,574
Comparisons
944
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
450
Avg. Rating
7.7
26th
Views
208
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Quality ManagerStryka, Plutora Test, Plutora Environments
Learn
IBM
Plutora
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Plutora Environments is a complete pre-production environment management solution for large enterprises. It gives internal and external environment teams one place to collaborate on and view environment bookings, configurations, and conflicts. Plutora Environments supports the intake of booking requests, change requests, and allocations. It helps detect conflicts, analyze impact, and set up notifications for stakeholders. Plutora Environments improves the quality, availability, and utilization of environments by reducing costs and delays. It simplifies the management of requests by providing a single system for all tracking and reduces build time by supporting automation tools. It integrates with Plutora Release and existing ITSM tools to help track the relationships between releases and environments.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Plutora Test Environment Management
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, Itaƒ BBA, BarreBay, United Energy and Multinet Gas (UE & MG), Service NSW, BT Financial Group, Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
Government9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2020.
425,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.