We performed a comparison between IBM Engineering Workflow Management and Visual SourceSafe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, Microsoft and others in Software Configuration Management.More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 7th in Software Configuration Management with 14 reviews while Visual SourceSafe is ranked 14th in Software Configuration Management. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8, while Visual SourceSafe is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual SourceSafe writes "Provides for the setup of software development teams in a sandbox environment. I would like to see external backup for project source code files to the cloud". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, GitLab and Polarion ALM, whereas Visual SourceSafe is most compared with .
See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.