2018-05-16T08:31:00Z

What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

We are currently using version four, but we looked at versions five and six and they are getting better and better. They're making planning easier. In version six they have something called a Quick Planner which would be nice to have in our version. In fact, if many of the features they have in five and six could be offered in four as well, that would be beneficial to us. Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified. For example: setup sprint/iteration period - start and end. It may be simple to have a button to End Sprint / Start new Sprint and the application handle setup and definition. Another example in user holiday's handling to have one click to apply general holiday that applies to all team members.

2019-09-24T05:43:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

A lot of room for improvement: * Report generation (.xls, .pdf) from filters. * "Contributor list" and "enumeration list" in plans and reporting. * Extending JavaScript support. * Team availability calendar on dashboard and plans. * Automatic subscription of users to dedicated types of work items, but not all of them. * Plan modifications from widgets to dashboards, if the option is displayed.

2018-08-14T11:13:00Z
author avatar
Real User

Upgrades, even minor versions, seem too labour intensive, especially with the enhanced objects, which is why the Jazz platform should be so good.

2018-05-16T08:31:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Micro Focus and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: October 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.