Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Polarion ALM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.""Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pros »

"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it.""You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs.""We had a nice experience with technical support.""It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins.""The technical support is quite good."

More Polarion ALM Pros »

Cons
"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.""Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Cons »

"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience.""The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on.""The ease-of-use could be improved a little.""Technical support needs some improvement.""The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."

More Polarion ALM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.""It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises.""If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

More Polarion ALM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,317
Comparisons
2,373
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
519
Rating
7.0
Views
2,466
Comparisons
1,721
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
592
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Learn
IBM
Siemens
Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Learn more about Polarion ALM
Sample Customers
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS ITEngineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Manufacturing Company13%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider23%
Manufacturing Company19%
Healthcare Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 2 reviews while Polarion ALM is ranked 6th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 5 reviews. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 7.0, while Polarion ALM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "The amount of document control, combined with review and release probabilities and signatures is really useful". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, CA Endevor Software Change Manager and Rally Software, whereas Polarion ALM is most compared with Jira, PTC Integrity, Microsoft Azure DevOps, codeBeamer ALM and ServiceNow IT Business Management. See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM report.

See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.