Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 3 reviews while Polarion ALM is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 2 reviews. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 7.0, while Polarion ALM is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "Straightforward setup and the support is ok, but usability is hindered by too many items in one LiveDoc". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with JIRA, TFS and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Polarion ALM is most compared with codeBeamer ALM, PTC Integrity and JIRA. See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Polarion ALM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture.All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.

Read more »

You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs.The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it.

Read more »

Cons
Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans.Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.

Read more »

The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on.The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,967
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
385
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
1,607
Comparisons
1,269
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
475
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Learn
IBM
Siemens
Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Learn more about Polarion ALM
Sample Customers
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS ITEngineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company19%
Insurance Company16%
Manufacturing Company14%
Comms Service Provider8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.