Compare IBM Security Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security.""It's a good solution for identification and access management."

More IBM Security Access Manager Pros »

"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products.""I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one.""The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients.""In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively.""The product allows customization via custom code.""The product was built to be scalable.""Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."

More Oracle Access Manager Pros »

Cons
"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user.""The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

More IBM Security Access Manager Cons »

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products.""In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface.""The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality.""The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive.""The technical support is not very good at all.""The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure.""There are problems with stability.""The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

More Oracle Access Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market.
Top Answer: The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly. Nowadays, most of the solutions are a few clicks before they are… more »
Top Answer: We are Integrators. We implement and integrate this product for our clients, as well as provide support to our client who is using this solution. Mainly, we are using it to provide access to two… more »
Ranking
13th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
1,397
Comparisons
1,171
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
227
Rating
7.5
4th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
1,591
Comparisons
1,045
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
655
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ISAM
Learn More
Overview

IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager.

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Security Access Manager
Learn more about Oracle Access Manager
Sample Customers
POST Luxembourg
SekerBank, University of Melbourne
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Insurance Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Government18%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business45%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 13th in Access Management with 2 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 4th in Access Management with 6 reviews. IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Has the ability to customize it with your own code but is too complex for most uses". IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Azure Active Directory, F5 Access Policy Manager, ForgeRock and i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock, Azure Active Directory, Symantec Siteminder and PingID. See our IBM Security Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.