Compare IBM solidDB vs. Teradata

IBM solidDB is ranked 27th in Relational Databases while Teradata is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 12 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0, while Teradata is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Exadata and Amazon Redshift.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
532 views|347 comparisons
Teradata Logo
20,491 views|15,709 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
384,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space.We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise.Price is quite high, so if it is really possible to use other solutions (e.g. you do not have strict requirements for performance and huge data volumes), it might be better to look at alternatives from the RDBMS world.Teradata is expensive but gives value for money, especially if you don't want to move your data to the cloud.It is still a very expensive solution. While I very much like the pure technological supremacy of the software itself, I believe Teradata as a company needs to become more affordable. They are already losing the market to more flexible or cheaper competitors.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
384,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
27th
Views
532
Comparisons
347
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
3rd
Views
20,491
Comparisons
15,709
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
212
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
Teradata
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Teradata
Sample Customers
IskratelNetflix
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider43%
Manufacturing Company14%
Logistics Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Financial Services Firm14%
Media Company8%
Comms Service Provider8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
384,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email