Compare IBM solidDB vs. Teradata

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
387 views|194 comparisons
Teradata Logo
18,536 views|13,459 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space.""The solution requires a license."

More Teradata Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The performance is great, we are able to query our data in one operation.
Top Answer: I would like to see more integration with many different types of data.
Top Answer: We are using this solution to check and validated our data.
Ranking
30th
Views
387
Comparisons
194
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
18,536
Comparisons
13,459
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
268
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn More
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Teradata
Sample Customers
Iskratel
Netflix
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider30%
Energy/Utilities Company20%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM solidDB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases while Teradata is ranked 6th in Relational Databases with 5 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Good data warehousing, scalable, and offers good functionality". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Teradata is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Snowflake, SQL Server, Amazon Redshift and Oracle Database.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.