IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

As of June 2019, IBM Spectrum Scale is ranked 12th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 4 reviews vs Red Hat Gluster Storage which is ranked 14th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Scale writes "As far as capacity is concerned, it can handle most heavy loads". The top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "The price tag is good compared to the amount of data and high availability provided". IBM Spectrum Scale is most compared with Red Hat Gluster Storage, Red Hat Ceph Storage and VMware vSAN. Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with LizardFS, VMware vSAN and IBM Spectrum Scale.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, StarWind, IBM and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2019.
348,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It makes our file system sharing a lot easier, even across different continents. We have had file systems shared across different continents with no performance degradation.It has been pretty reliable throughout the years. As far as capacity is concerned, it can handle most heavy loads.We can have multiple systems within the same file system.Technical support has been very helpful. They provide us with pretty good solutions that we can implement moving forward.Allows us to share files across multiple environments.It is incredibly scalable and stable.Its great servicing high availability. That is what it is used for.

Read more »

The price tag is good compared to the amount of data and high availability provided.

Read more »

Cons
Maybe it needs integration with HA.They should probably simply the Red Hat implementation portion. This portion was not as straightforward as I would like it to be.We do have some issues where Spectrum Scale does not work as expected. We have seen our Spectrum Scale servers go down unexpectedly, but because we have a cluster, it does not take out the entire organization.Making it a little easier to add bad file sets would help. There is a transition to how you add storage and how you add a file set, so making that a little smoother would probably be my recommendation.This is probably the biggest challenge, getting everything upgraded, because it just takes time. We wish it was a faster solution to be able to do everything at once, but you have do each node individually. The more nodes, the longer it takes.The main issue that we have now is with the encryption. They want to use more metrics in encryption, which is not working very well.

Read more »

The system should be more intuitive and easier to manage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
If you need cheap storage, but still need high availability, it's a good product to look at.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
348,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,528
Comparisons
1,778
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
416
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
3,017
Comparisons
2,405
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
327
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Also Known As
Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
Learn
IBM
Red Hat
Overview
IBM Spectrum Scale is a cluster file system that provides concurrent access to a single file system or set of file systems from multiple nodes. The nodes can be SAN attached, network attached, a mixture of SAN attached and network attached, or in a shared nothing cluster configuration. This enables access to this common set of data to support a scale-out solution or to provide a high availability platform. IBM Spectrum Scale has many features beyond common data access including data replication, policy based storage management, and multi-site operations. You can create a cluster of AIX nodes, Linux nodes, Windows server nodes, or a mix of all three. IBM Spectrum Scale can run on virtualized instances providing common data access in environments, leverage logical partitioning, or other hypervisors. Multiple IBM Spectrum Scale clusters can share data within a location or across wide area network (WAN) connections.

Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Spectrum Scale
Learn more about Red Hat Gluster Storage
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, StarWind, IBM and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2019.
348,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email