Compare Red Hat Ceph Storage vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, Zadara and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2021.
513,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The configuration of the solution and the user interface are both quite good."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros »

"It's very easy to upgrade storage."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Pros »

Cons
"The management features are pretty good, but they still have room for improvement."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons »

"The user interface could be simplified."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
513,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
28,362
Comparisons
22,898
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
230
Rating
7.0
Views
4,923
Comparisons
3,671
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
242
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Ceph
Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
Learn More
Overview
Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.

Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

Offer
Learn more about Red Hat Ceph Storage
Learn more about Red Hat Gluster Storage
Sample Customers
Dell, DreamHost
NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider28%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider28%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, Zadara and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2021.
513,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 7th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review while Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 17th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review. Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 7.0, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Excellent user interface, good configuration capabilities and quite stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "Easy to upgrade but the interface should be simplified". Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, IBM Spectrum Scale and StarWind Virtual SAN, whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, LizardFS and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.