IBM Trusteer vs Pindrop Protect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,011 views|661 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Pindrop Logo
144 views|109 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Trusteer and Pindrop Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
1,011
Comparisons
661
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
144
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM Trusteer Pinpoint Detect, helps protect digital channels against account takeover, fraudulent transactions, and can detect end user devices infected with high risk malware. Trusteer Pinpoint Detect is a cloud-based solution that can transparently build user profiles and continuously authenticate online identities to more efficiently differentiate between a true user and fraudsters. It is designed to enable a real-time risk assessment with an actionable recommendations, employ behavioral biometrics capabilities to seamlessly build models based on patterns of mouse movements in real-time and analyze patterns against learned user behavior and known fraud patterns, identify access using compromised credentials and provide actionable recommendations to help detect and mitigate fraudulent activities and control and create custom policies to help you rapidly build and deploy countermeasures leveraging machine learning and advanced analytics.

Pindrop Protect provides a risk score and call intelligence to the call center in the first few seconds of each call. The risk score - along with the analysis of the caller’s voice, device, and behavior - is provided to the call center’s fraud analyst team for further investigation. Pindrop’s proprietary machine learning algorithms then use feedback from the investigation to maximize solution performance.

Sample Customers
Banco Satander
PSCU, Lloyd's Banking Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm47%
Computer Software Company12%
Insurance Company6%
Comms Service Provider5%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Trusteer is ranked 12th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Pindrop Protect is ranked 37th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. IBM Trusteer is rated 9.0, while Pindrop Protect is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Trusteer writes "The features were pretty straightforward". On the other hand, IBM Trusteer is most compared with BioCatch, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix, F5 Shape Security and Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, whereas Pindrop Protect is most compared with .

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.