Imperva Web Application Firewall vs R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imperva Web Application Firewall and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Answer: Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Configuration for different application sources is most valuable. We can segregate the traffic that an application is carrying and identify the sizing in Imperva.""The solution is very scalable. It is one of the most important features. You can also expand resources and features as well.""There is a quick switch between any of the the nodes if something goes wrong, where there's a there's an attack against a specific area. The security setup is reasonably easy. It's not a problem to do setups and rules and integrations. And, yeah, just the the back end team is also very willing to insist if there's questions that that we cannot answer or with these questions that we do have""Learning mode and custom policies are helpful features.""The most valuable feature of Imperva, in addition to its strong knowledge base, is its effective protection for web applications.""The most important feature I have found to be the ease in how to do the backup and restores.""Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way.""Imperva Web Application Firewall is stable."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pros →

"The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."

More R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) Pros →

Cons
"The tool needs to improve CPU and storage memory.""Imperva Web Application Firewall can improve by providing better features, such as improved prevention of zero-day attacks. Additionally, it should include a VR meta-analysis.""The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you.""Imperva Web Application Firewall could improve the console by making it easier to use.""There's always room for improvement. Occasionally, there might be false-positive alerts.""Imperva Web Application Firewall can improve by adding more features to the dashboard. increasing the visibility of the real-time events, besides configuring the administration itself.""Some of the features should be included in the next release is a file integrating monitoring tool. This feature should be improved.""The Imperva Web Application Firewall automations are good, but there is still room for improvement with them."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Cons →

"The area that should be improved is licensing."

More R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately."
  • "Everybody complains about the price of this solution."
  • "The cost of this solution depends on the platform."
  • "The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors."
  • "There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."
  • "There is a license for this solution and we purchase the license annually with no additional fees."
  • "There are a couple of different licensing models."
  • "The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."
  • More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Prasert Mahapol
    reviewer1662357 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1662357 (Works at Ally Financial Inc.)
    Real User

    Imperva Cloud WAF by far.

    Thameem Ansari - PeerSpot reviewerThameem Ansari
    Real User

    Imperva or F5 if you don't have budget constraints. there is budget limitation means you can look barracuda, Radware, A10 or fortinet

    reviewer1304067 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1304067 (Product Manager (Zscaler) at a tech services company with 201-500 employees)
    Real User

    I would recommend you to look at F5 AWAF solution. If you need more information, please reach me through my email ammar.anis@westcon and I shall be happy to help.

    Ricardo Fernandes - PeerSpot reviewerRicardo Fernandes
    Real User

    We have had a very good experience with FortiWeb.

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
    Top Answer:You can have a look to Imperva Cloud WAF, the anti-DDoS mitigation is under 1s and works very well. I observed a lot of DDoS attacks that were well managed (even not seen by the customer) by Imperva… more »
    Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
    Ranking
    Views
    8,226
    Comparisons
    6,592
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    361
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    537
    Comparisons
    250
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
    Learn More
    Overview

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is a versatile solution that protects web applications and databases from various attacks, including DDoS, cross-site scripting, and SQL injection attacks. It offers data security, availability, and access control and can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud. 

    The solution has good security against web attacks and offers advanced bot protection, API security, and mitigation features. Imperva WAF is easy to configure and deploy; it has good customer service and an excellent user interface.

    Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

    Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

    Sample Customers
    BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Insurance Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 46 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Offers simulation for studying infrastructure and hybrid infrastructure protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.