Compare Infoblox DNS Firewall vs. Trustwave Secure Web Gateway

Infoblox DNS Firewall is ranked 11th in Web Security Gateways with 3 reviews while Trustwave Secure Web Gateway is ranked 18th in Web Security Gateways with 1 review. Infoblox DNS Firewall is rated 8.0, while Trustwave Secure Web Gateway is rated 0. The top reviewer of Infoblox DNS Firewall writes "Good granularity for control and checks DNS queries completely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave Secure Web Gateway writes "Enables policies on threats from downloads, social networks, and AV plug-ins". Infoblox DNS Firewall is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access and Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, whereas Trustwave Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Trustwave WebMarshal.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, McAfee and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: March 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature of this solution is the granularity for which you can categorize what you want to block versus what you don't want to block.With the model we have, we are able to scale very easily if we need to.The most important features for us are preventing DDOS DNS attacks.

Read more »

Enables policies on downloads, social networks, and AV plug-ins. These are major threat sources and with the inclusion of AV plug-in, Secure Web Gateway is a better product.

Read more »

Cons
We would like to see more reporting capabilities that are now offered only with the on-premises reporting appliance.The dashboard and reporting features need improvement. The user needs more informative dashboards so they can get to the results directly without getting deep in the report to get to the information.Endpoint solutions need to improved.

Read more »

The default size for database logging should be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing is set up such that you pay for the number of active users that you're defending at the moment.

Read more »

Pricing is favorable. Yearly licensing is preferable.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Security Gateways solutions are best for your needs.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
11th
Views
443
Comparisons
271
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
374
Avg. Rating
8.0
18th
Views
264
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
215
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Trustwave SWG
Learn
Infoblox
Trustwave
Overview

Infoblox DNS Firewall is the leading DNS-based network security solution which effectively contains and controls malware communications and prevents data exfiltration, thereby securing your assets and business. It also provides insights on threats, helps isolate infected devices for remediation, and stays current with the evolving threat landscape through an automated threat intelligence feed.

Trustwave SWG blocks new malware in real time with several advanced engines. To block dynamic new obfuscated or encrypted drive-by downloads, Trustwave SWG decrypts, unpacks and assembles web pages and exposes their malicious behavior. Trustwave leads the industry in this advanced capability.

Offer
Learn more about Infoblox DNS Firewall
Learn more about Trustwave Secure Web Gateway
Sample Customers
Council Rock School District
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, McAfee and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: March 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Security Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.