We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The serverless capability and the packaging application of the solution are valuable."
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The data mapping capability is a valuable feature."
"The features I find most valuable is the synchronization, verification, functionalities and all the data integration features."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"The solution provides increased efficiency while still being user-friendly and easy to operate."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
"I would like to see support for more data sources."
"I would like to see more functionality added so that it is a bit closer to how much you can do with Informatica PowerCenter."
"The integration process is not easy."
"One area where Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve is in providing more accelerators for certain functionalities."
"User/group administration could use improvement."
"There is room for improvement at the highest level in terms of useability and connectors for various types of new applications. The row processing performance could be better because you experience some latency dealing with high volumes of data. Most organizations will be dealing with multiple cloud applications, so you could see performance issues moving from one system to another."
"The regions in which the data resides are still limited. This could be an issue in terms of the data residency laws of some of the countries. They should get more regions."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 13th in Cloud Data Integration with 3 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Zapier and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.