We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Archive and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management."One of the most valuable features of Informatica Data Archive is its performance."
"The most valuable features of Informatica Data Archive are ease of use, and the flows from one layer to the next are simple to understand."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."
"I am impressed with the tool's possibility of integrating different systems in a unified place."
"Many of the features of Oracle GoldenGate are valuable. We use Oracle databases and this tool is from Oracle, making it have superior compatibility."
"Oracle GoldenGate features work fine, which is what I like about it. I also like that it's scalable, easy to set up, and has good technical support."
"This is a powerful solution provided by one of the most respected companies in the computer industry."
"Since the world is going towards open source, the solution's heterogeneous data migration feature is very useful."
"This solution has a well-known procedure for troubleshooting and tuning the performance, providing for smooth operation."
"The recovery features could improve in Informatica Data Archive."
"Informatica Data Archive could improve by providing training. Training is one area where we lack, there are not very many trained resources in the market for sales, GPM, proposals, new offerings, or new features that are being added to this solution. It would be really helpful for consultants, like me, to understand the new, cool features these solutions are constantly adding. Training is something, that should be in place."
"Oracle GoldenGate's installation is not user-friendly, we had to read a lot of documentation for the setup and configuration."
"The front-end management isn't very good."
"The solution needs to improve its latency, monitoring and support."
"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."
Informatica Data Archive is ranked 18th in Database Development and Management with 2 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Informatica Data Archive is rated 8.6, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Archive writes "Easy to understand layer flows, reliable, and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Informatica Data Archive is most compared with IBM InfoSphere Optim, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI).
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
