Compare Information Builders WebFOCUS vs. RapidMiner

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Information Builders WebFOCUS vs. RapidMiner and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The client only has to pay the licensing costs. There are not any maintenance or hidden costs in addition to the license.Although we don't pay licensing fees because it is being used within the university, my understanding is that the cost is between $5,000 and $10,000 USD per year.I used an educational license for this solution, which is available free of charge.

More RapidMiner Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Predictive Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
1,575
Comparisons
984
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
253
Avg. Rating
8.7
3rd
Views
9,287
Comparisons
7,585
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
656
Avg. Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
WebFOCUS
Learn
Information Builders
RapidMiner
Overview

WebFOCUS is a strategic enterprise business intelligence (BI) and analytics platform that enables any executive, manager, analyst, employee, partner, or customer to execute smarter business from trusted data. The platform includes cutting-edge capabilities that provide organizations with everything they need to turn data into insight, and insight into impact.

RapidMiner's unified data science platform accelerates the building of complete analytical workflows - from data prep to machine learning to model validation to deployment - in a single environment, improving efficiency and shortening the time to value for data science projects.

Offer
Learn more about Information Builders WebFOCUS
Learn more about RapidMiner
Sample Customers
Ace Hardware, AutoZone, Fred Hutch, MasterCard, OFS Brands, PostFinance, Real D, Yellow Pages, ABC Financial, AcuSport, BBVA, BabcockPayPal, Deloitte, eBay, Cisco, Miele, Volkswagen
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
University11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise36%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise60%
Find out what your peers are saying about Information Builders WebFOCUS vs. RapidMiner and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Information Builders WebFOCUS is ranked 4th in Predictive Analytics with 10 reviews while RapidMiner is ranked 3rd in Predictive Analytics with 8 reviews. Information Builders WebFOCUS is rated 8.8, while RapidMiner is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Information Builders WebFOCUS writes "Allows decision makers to harness the power of data to make strategic decisions that will advance the goals and objectives of the organization. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RapidMiner writes "Offers good tutorials that make it easy to learn and use, with a powerful feature to compare machine learning algorithms". Information Builders WebFOCUS is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft BI, IBM Cognos, Oracle OBIEE and Qlik Sense, whereas RapidMiner is most compared with KNIME, Alteryx, Dataiku Data Science Studio, IBM SPSS Modeler and Tableau. See our Information Builders WebFOCUS vs. RapidMiner report.

See our list of best Predictive Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Predictive Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.