We performed a comparison between Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and QPR ProcessDesigner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pros →
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Cons →
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is ranked 20th in Business Process Design with 2 reviews while QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is rated 9.0, while QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center writes "Highly integrated, user-friendly, and supports mobile devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is most compared with , whereas QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
