We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Veritas Backup Exec based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"This solution works well and has good integration with technologies such as VMware and Hyper-V."
"It is easy to set up and use for daily processes and a good solution for preserving crucial data."
"The dashboard was good. I loved to see the maintenance dashboard every time I logged on. That was my first screen because it always gave me a reminder of how many days before my next renewal."
"Veritas Backup Exec is easily managed."
"Veritas is simple and easy to deploy. In terms of the presentation and UI, they do their job well."
"Recovery via Active Directory is painless and much easier than the complicated setup procedures of other products."
"The most important feature is the variety of backup applications it supports, including ERP systems and most other programs, such as Microsoft."
"The product provides automated and faster data backup and recovery compared to other vendors."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The cost is quite high. Along with the general costs, the supposed agents that you have to buy for the various options that you want to use ends up driving the costs higher as well."
"More stable environment in a WAN infrastructure."
"There needs to be an integration process of the endpoint devices so that we don't have to redo everything for different products."
"The solution is too heavy and complex with 1,000 menus and options that make it messy rather than lightweight."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"I have experienced some errors, such as failures, but there have not been very many."
"At the moment, we have a very complex environment. It would take some time to deploy an environment like ours from scratch."
"The one thing which could be improved, which we have informed Veritas about, is the ability to plug in to the cloud. Meaning, instead of using local storage if we're backing up a small user or end user, we want to be able to make it so they can direct the backups directly to the cloud. It can't be done at the moment. We can only back up to the storage then replicate to the cloud, but we cannot use the cloud as a source of storage."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Veritas Backup Exec is ranked 15th in Backup and Recovery with 71 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Veritas Backup Exec is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas Backup Exec writes "Highly stable, intuitive design, and integrates well". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Veritas Backup Exec is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault Cloud and Veritas System Recovery. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Veritas Backup Exec report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.