We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Microsoft Windows Server Update Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is a stable product."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."
"I like that we could evaluate every client and compare some weaknesses and vulnerability exploits in Microsoft Windows Server Update Services. This is a useful way to test applications against an attacker attempting to exploit the operating system."
"The solution has great potential and leaves the user with almost limitless possibilities. It is truly a product with a million uses."
"It provides central management interface for deployment."
"Once we configure it and it keeps updating the patches, all I need to do is filter out which patches are required or not."
"The most important aspect is that we can centrally deploy the updates that are necessary for the organization. It's important."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is an easy-to-use and stable solution."
"The solution gives authentic updates."
"The most valuable feature is the decreased level of internet usage by my network."
"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."
"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."
"The tool needs to improve its visual system."
"The reporting is not as practical as I would like it to be."
"The product needs to improve its user interface."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve by being less cumbersome to use. It's somewhat difficult to use, but we manage to get through it."
"The database could be improved. In large environments, for example, we often get problems with reporting."
"The old backup files created by this solution use up a lot of storage, and this needs to be improved."
"User interface is outdated and not user-friendly."
"Microsoft should improve their support for the product. A lot of guys are installing their products, especially Xero. If you have a real problem, though, it's quite difficult to find someone who you can support you."
"A few bugs need to be figured out for the security side."
More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is ranked 15th in Patch Management with 4 reviews while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 38 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac writes "With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "Lets us manage all our organization's updates from a single management console". Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is most compared with Ivanti Security Controls, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with BigFix, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Quest KACE Systems Management, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune. See our Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.