JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,907
    Comparisons
    2,515
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    270
    Rating
    9.3
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
    NetWeaver Composition Environment
    Learn More
    Overview
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
    SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment (SAP NetWeaver CE) is a robust and lean standard-based platform that enables to develop Java and composite applications from scratch and on top of existing services. SAP NetWeaver CE can realize development projects that correspond to use case Building Composite Applications of SAP NetWeaver.
    Sample Customers
    APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
    German Football Association
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government7%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.