We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides the power to understand and automate processes."
"There are a lot of things that you get out-of-the-box: Timers and so on, which took a lot of effort and code before."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to customize your rules and put them inside the tool."
"It provides value and simplifies processes."
"Everything is coupled together and comes as one solution."
"This tool is very useful when it comes to enterprise-grade automation and governmental processes for the security aspects, performance, and reliability."
"It has improved my organization quite a bit. It brought awareness to what the business processes are, even to the business side, who did not necessarily know what they are."
"Agility is the key. It gives our customers a faster way to be able to implement processes, get ownership of task, visibility into a process. The ability to modify that process, optimize that process over time, is probably the biggest benefit that they get from the software."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"The integration could be improved."
"I would like to see a lot more case studies."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"I would like to see the front-end support improved because it should be fully integrated and supported."
"IBM BPM is stable, but sometimes there are issues with the server."
"UI is an area with a shortcoming that needs improvement."
"We thought there might have been a little more discussion early on about, "Hey, if you're doing this, set it up this way," or some best practices or some guidance that we didn't get."
"There needs to be better documentation for IBM BPM in a central place. There is not any standard documentation for each component available and has been a barrier for developers."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"This solution needs better management UI."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM BPM is ranked 7th in Application Infrastructure with 105 reviews while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus. See our IBM BPM vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.