We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"The setup is easy."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"It's very tedious to manage."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Appian, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Newgen OmniFlow. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.