Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
k6 Logo
37 views|28 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SeleniumHQ Logo
3,529 views|3,026 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between k6 Open Source and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
NalinGoonawardana
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

More k6 Open Source Pros →

"Ability to integrate with every other tool.""It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages.""You can build your own framework. I think that's the most powerful feature. You can connect with a lot of other tools that use frameworks, or keywords, etc. That helps make it a stronger solution.""Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run.""The most valuable features of this solution are its flexibility, being open source, and it has close to no limits when it comes to integrating with any language, or browser you are using.""Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable.""The main characteristic that is useful is that the tool is completely free.""The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."

More Selenium HQ Pros →

Cons
"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

More k6 Open Source Cons →

"An improvement to Selenium HQ would be the inclusion of a facility to work on Shadow DOM.""It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background.""The latest versions are often unstable.""Selenium HQ doesn't support Windows-based applications, so we need to integrate with the third-party vendor. It would be great if Selenium could include Windows-based automation. You need to integrate it with a third-party tool if you want to upload any files. When we interact with a Windows application, we usually use Tosca.""Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way.""It would be very helpful to be able to write scripts in a GUI, rather than depend so heavily on the command line.""It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly.""It would be better if we could use it without having the technical skills to run the scripting test."

More Selenium HQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is free to use."
  • "There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0."
  • "It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license."
  • "Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing."
  • "It is free."
  • "This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it."
  • "We are satisfied with the pricing."
  • "It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."
  • More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.
    Top Answer:One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code… more »
    Top Answer:k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.
    Top Answer:Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate… more »
    Top Answer:Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
    Ranking
    14th
    Views
    37
    Comparisons
    28
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    500
    Rating
    7.0
    4th
    Views
    3,529
    Comparisons
    3,026
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    403
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Load Impact
    SeleniumHQ
    Learn More
    k6
    Video Not Available
    SeleniumHQ
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Load Impact offers three main features:

    1. Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
    2. API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
    3. Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

    Selenium HQ is an umbrella project that includes a number of tools and frameworks that allow for web browser automation. In particular, Selenium offers a framework for the W3C WebDriver specification, a platform- and language-neutral coding interface that works with all of the main web browsers.

    Selenium is a toolset for automating web browsers that uses the best methods available to remotely control browser instances and simulate a user's interaction with the browser. It enables users to mimic typical end-user actions, such as typing text into forms, choosing options from drop-down menus, checking boxes, and clicking links in documents. Additionally, it offers a wide range of other controls, including mouse movement, arbitrary JavaScript execution, and much more.

    Although Selenium HQ is generally used for front-end website testing, it is also a browser user agent library. The interfaces are universal in their use, which enables composition with other libraries to serve your purpose.

    The source code for Selenium is accessible under the Apache 2.0 license. The project is made possible by volunteers who have kindly committed hundreds of hours to the development and maintenance of the code.

    Selenium HQ Tools

    These three main Selenium HQ tools have powerful capabilities:

    • WebDriver: If you are just starting out with desktop or mobile website test automation, you will be using WebDriver APIs. WebDriver controls the browser and executes tests using the automation APIs that browser vendors provide. This gives the impression that a real person is using the browser. Because WebDriver's API does not need to be compiled alongside application code, it is not intrusive. As a result, you can test the same application that you push live.

    • IDE: Develop your Selenium test cases using an IDE (integrated development environment). The most effective way to create test cases is to utilize this simple Chrome and Firefox extension. IDE uses Selenium commands that are already in use to record user activity in the browser with parameters set by the context of the element. This is an excellent approach to learning Selenium script syntax and will save you time.

    • Grid: You can run test cases on several machines and operating systems with Selenium Grid. The local end controls how the test cases are triggered, and the remote end automatically runs the test cases after they are triggered.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Selenium HQ stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its driver interface and its speed. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:


    Avijit B., an automation tester at a tech services company, writes of the solution, “The driver interface is really useful. When we implement the Selenium driver interface, we can easily navigate through all of the pages and sections of an app, including performing things like clicking, putting through SendKeys, scrolling down, tagging, and all the other actions we need to test for in an application.”

    Another PeerSpot reviewer, a software engineer at a financial services firm, notes, “Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop."

    Sample Customers
    rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT
    BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Retailer10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Regression Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    k6 Open Source is ranked 14th in Regression Testing Tools with 1 review while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 102 reviews. k6 Open Source is rated 7.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of k6 Open Source writes "Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". k6 Open Source is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad and RadView WebLOAD, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.

    See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.