Selenium HQ Competitors and Alternatives

The top Selenium HQ competitors are
  • Tricentis Tosca
  • Katalon Studio
  • UFT Pro (LeanFT)
  • SmartBear TestComplete
  • froglogic Squish
  • Oracle Application Testing Suite
  • ZAPTEST
  • Telerik Test Studio
Read reviews of Selenium HQ competitors and alternatives
Suraj Chavan
Consultant
Test Automation Engineer at Infosys
Jul 12 2017

What is most valuable?

The model-based scriptless automation is the most valuable feature because it needs less maintenance as compared to... more»

How has it helped my organization?

Tosca follows the shift-left approach. A new resource can start automation on the first day of its project.

What needs improvement?

Parallel execution is not yet implemented for Tosca. This means you can't execute the same test case on multiple... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

No idea about the licensing cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Previously, we were using Selenium. We switched to Tosca due to the less maintenance aspect and the wide technology... more»

What other advice do I have?

If you are looking for automation of the packaged application and less maintenance, then go for Tosca.
Sudhakar Shanmuga Sundaram
Consultant
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jun 14 2017

What is most valuable?

1. IBM RFT supports both .NET and Java as the programming language for scripting, but the market widely usage was Java... more»

How has it helped my organization?

Robust API provides quick turnaround for developers to understand and automate functional test case quickly.

What needs improvement?

Didn't find any since they provide light weight usage for execution and script development without tool dependency than... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

One time license cost involved and pretty less than compared to the other commercial products.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No.

What other advice do I have?

Use this product for thick client application like sap, siebel, flex etc
Karsten Rackwitz
Real User
Teamleader Test Software at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Jul 25 2018

What is most valuable?

* The availability of the support. * The internet presentation: If there are any questions, most of the questions can be answered with the web... more»

How has it helped my organization?

We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual. Now, it is possible to automate them.

What needs improvement?

A step forward would be to have event support; supporting different events. At the moment, it is more or less linear. We write the code, but... more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Previously, we used C# based implementation. The reason that we changed was the instability and inflexibility of the tool. If the system on the... more»

What other advice do I have?

You should be very clear about what your goals are. If you have this, then check the fit and the match. Afterwards, have a trial period and... more»

Sign Up with Email