Selenium HQ Alternatives and Competitors
Read reviews of Selenium HQ alternatives and competitors
Review of Worksoft
Feb 11 2019
What is most valuable?It is fairly straightforward. We have some deep expertise after using it for five years. We have some people who know it now very well. This type of marginalization of the… more»
How has it helped my organization?It has cut down on the amount of low level, grunt work that business analysts have to do and can free them up to do more critical thinking. Before we had test automation… more»
What needs improvement?One feature that we have been asking for has been to treat tests as code and store the source code for tests in a configuration management tool. Right now, for version… more»
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than… more»
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?It was all manual. For convenience, we used Micro Focus ALM for tracking our manual tests. We still use that as our central hub for our test documentation. We weren't… more»
What other advice do I have?The technical instrumentation was pretty straightforward. The tool does what we need it to do. The primary challenges that we have had with test automation have been… more»
Which other solutions did I evaluate?We also looked at HPE UFT (the HPE automated testing tools) and SAP TAO (SAP's own internal test automation). The reason we pretty quickly went with Worksoft was primarily… more»
Review of Micro Focus
Aug 25 2019
What is most valuable?The ability to evaluate live applications in our production environment for unusual behavior and determine problem areas and solutions is the most valuable aspect of this… more»
How has it helped my organization?It gives us the opportunity to serve banking clients while conforming to industry regulations.
What needs improvement?As far as things that can be improved, it is a good solution so I think I can only do a comparison. We also use QC/ALM (Application Lifecycle Management [Quality Center])… more»
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?I think the cost of UFT is too high and obviously expensive, especially if you consider that there are other even better products, in my opinion, that are open-source… more»
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?I switched from development to quality testing. Since that time, I used many products including UFT. We had some solutions in basic. After that, I used several products… more»
What other advice do I have?I prefer other products like Selenium to UFT, but each product has its advantages. For example, in UFT we can test HTML protocol for the web applications and also desktop… more»
Which other solutions did I evaluate?Because we need to properly support people in banking and follow regulations, we use UFT. It is really more of a political decision than a proper choice as to the products… more»
Review of SmartBear
Jun 13 2018
What is most valuable?I use the screenshot functionality most frequently and live testing on occasion. I have also used the record and replay functionality once or twice. With screenshots, I… more»
How has it helped my organization?This solution improves the customer experience using Quartzy. It has saved us time and money on our web app. It would taken time to look across many devices and browser… more»
What needs improvement?A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?We did not have a previous solution.
What other advice do I have?Go for it!
Which other solutions did I evaluate?We also looked at Selenium, Rainforest QA, and BrowserStack.
Review of Microsoft
Jan 07 2020
Built-in support for testing C# and .NET is helpful in our continuous integration development process