We performed a comparison between Keeper and WSO2 Identity Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HashiCorp, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers."Auto login across platforms allows for no copying and pasting."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"The possibility of assigning information to different groups and individuals has been the most valuable."
"It keeps my passwords organized and safe."
"Possibility to login using the fingerprint sensor on Android/iPhone."
"It is very easy to install and setup."
"Chrome extension and app."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"Comprehensive ecosystem."
"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
"The keystore feature has been most valuable for us."
"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."
"It's very easy to implement everything."
"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."
"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"Search functions are sometimes weird."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"Rearranging folders via drag/drop functionality would be very helpful."
"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."
"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."
"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."
"The high availability architecture has to be improved."
"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."
"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."
"I found the initial setup to be very complex."
Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 6th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 7 reviews. Keeper is rated 9.2, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "Provides valuable API management features, but its technical documentation needs improvement". Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with Auth0, Amazon Cognito, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, SAP Identity Management and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
