We performed a comparison between SailPoint IdentityIQ and WSO2 Identity Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software."The most valuable feature for our customers and for us is the identity data warehouse."
"The initial setup isn't so difficult."
"It offers a single source of truth. Everything can be handled from one tier."
"This solution is easy to configure."
"We like the integration with other systems."
"Has a great certification module with intuitive options."
"The most valuable features of SailPoint IdentityIQ are the reporting because it is better than other solutions. The workflows can be customized to our requirements and the overall features are good."
"The access certification feature is valuable."
"The keystore feature has been most valuable for us."
"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."
"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
"Comprehensive ecosystem."
"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."
"It's very easy to implement everything."
"I would like for the next release to have a more user-friendly interface."
"It allowed to implement the automated processes when a new employee is hired. It allows to have a main central process for new hires."
"The user interface is not very user-friendly."
"The advanced provisioning features require more improvement."
"Some setups should be done in the interface and in the code, and could be made simpler."
"What it doesn't do is provide notice in the event of a vulnerability or offense from the security."
"It is too technical. You need really good technical skills in Java and other technologies, which are hard to find. If they can make it easier so that things can be done with a few clicks, it will be great."
"Regarding the scope for improvement in the solution, reporting is an area that can be a bit more UI-oriented."
"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."
"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."
"The high availability architecture has to be improved."
"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."
"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."
"I found the initial setup to be very complex."
"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."
SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 6th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 7 reviews. SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "Provides valuable API management features, but its technical documentation needs improvement". SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with Auth0, Amazon Cognito, SAP Identity Management, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and SecureAuth Identity Platform.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.