We performed a comparison between Kinetica and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."The solution scales easily."
"Teradata has good performance, the response times are very fast. Overall the solution is easy to use. When we do the transformation, we have all of our staging and aggregation data available."
"Building a data warehouse with Teradata has definitely helped a lot of our downstream applications to more easily access information."
"Teradata is a great, industry-leading data warehousing product that has MPP architecture."
"The key advantages are Performance when processing Terabytes of data and scalability."
"There are several features of Teradata that I like. One of the most basic is the indexes. I also like that it provides lower TCO. It also has the optimizer feature which is a good feature and isn't found in other legacy systems. Parallelism is also another feature I like in Teradata because when you are running or hosting on multiple systems, you have this shared-nothing architecture that helps. Loading and unloading in Teradata are also really helpful compared to other systems."
"It's very mature from a technology perspective."
"It's very, very fast"
"Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries."
"There are very limited resources available in the market in terms of implementation. They need to offer training plans for graduates so that more resources are available in the market."
"The solution needs improvement in its stability, support and pricing."
"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."
"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."
"An additional feature I would you like to see included in the next release, is that it needs to be more cloud-friendly."
"The increasing volumes of data demand more and more performance."
"Teradata's pricing is quite high compared to Redshift, Synapse, or GCP alternatives."
"I've been using the same UI for 20 years in Teradata. It could use some updating. Adding more stability around Teradata Studio would be outstanding. Teradata Studio is a Java-based version of their tool. It's much better now, but it still has some room for improvement."
"The current operational approach needs improvement."
Kinetica is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. Kinetica is rated 7.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kinetica writes "Easy to scale and good record to report capabilities but needs better training ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". Kinetica is most compared with SingleStore and OmniSci, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.