• Home
  • Tamr vs. Tungsten RPA

Tamr vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Tamr Logo

Tamr

415 views|368 comparisons
Tungsten Automation Logo

Tungsten RPA

Read 24 Tungsten RPA reviews
3,345 views|2,455 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Data Integration
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Tamr and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Tamr?
Anonymous User
Lengthy support wait times, missing features, but effective simple task automation
Kofax RPA has provided our organization with a lot of savings in many different areas and we have improvements in data quality.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
  • "Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
  • "I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."
  • "Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."
  • "There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."
  • "Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
  • "I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

    • More Tungsten RPA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Kofax RPA?
    Top Answer:You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
    Read all 20 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?
    Top Answer:Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.
    Read all 17 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?
    Top Answer:Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release… more »
    Read all 23 answers   →
    Ranking
    51st
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    415
    Comparisons
    368
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    12th
    out of 81 in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
    Views
    3,345
    Comparisons
    2,455
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    SAP Data Services logo
    SAP Data Services vs. Tamr
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Palantir Foundry logo
    Palantir Foundry vs. Tamr
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Collibra Catalog logo
    Collibra Catalog vs. Tamr
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Fivetran logo
    Fivetran vs. Tamr
    Compared 22% of the time.
    More Tamr Competitors   →
    UiPath logo
    UiPath vs. Tungsten RPA
    Compared 34% of the time.
    Blue Prism logo
    Blue Prism vs. Tungsten RPA
    Compared 11% of the time.
    SAS Data Management logo
    SAS Data Management vs. Tungsten RPA
    Compared 3% of the time.
    More Tungsten RPA Competitors   →
    Also Known As
    Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
    Learn More
    Tamr
    Video Not Available
    Tungsten Automation
    Overview

    Tamr enables enterprises to use 100% of available data for business intelligence and analytics by unifying and enriching their vast reserves of valuable data. Tamr's data unification platform catalogs, connects and curates hundreds or thousands of internal and external data sources through a combination of machine learning algorithms and human expert guidance - radically reducing the cost, time and effort of preparing data for analysis.

    Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.
    Sample Customers
    Toyota, Roche, Novartis, Thomson Reuters
    Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Logistics Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Tamr is ranked 51st in Data Integration while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Tamr is rated 0.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Tamr is most compared with SAP Data Services, Palantir Foundry, Collibra Catalog and Fivetran, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.