Compare Laserfiche Rio vs. Micro Focus Content Manager
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"This is a very complete and powerful solution." | "It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn." |
Cons | |
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI." | "Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,076 Comparisons 825 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 132 Rating 10.0 | Views 2,573 Comparisons 1,453 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 533 Rating 3.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 37% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. Compared 8% of the time. | Compared 37% of the time. Compared 15% of the time. Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager | |
Learn | |
| Laserfiche | Micro Focus |
Overview | |
| Powerful Document Management Software and Agile Enterprise Content Management Solutions | Micro Focus Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Laserfiche Rio | Learn more about Micro Focus Content Manager |
Sample Customers | |
| D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse | Missouri State Courts |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company33% Comms Service Provider14% Government11% Media Company6% | Government58% Healthcare Company8% Non Profit8% Non Tech Company8% Computer Software Company34% Government22% Comms Service Provider10% Media Company5% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business21% Midsize Enterprise36% Large Enterprise43% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Laserfiche Rio is ranked 8th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while Micro Focus Content Manager is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. Laserfiche Rio is rated 10.0, while Micro Focus Content Manager is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of Laserfiche Rio writes "A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Content Manager writes "Difficult to learn, poor technical support, and needs better integration with SharePoint". Laserfiche Rio is most compared with SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, IBM FileNet, OpenText Content Suite Platform and Hyland Perceptive Content, whereas Micro Focus Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, IBM FileNet, OpenText Content Suite Platform, Alfresco and IBM ECM.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.