Ranking | |
Views 96 Comparisons 40 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 3 Comparisons 3 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: January 2021. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 39% of the time. ![]() Compared 34% of the time. ![]() Compared 27% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
ActiveScale, Quantum ActiveScale Object Storage, ActiveScale Object Storage | |
Learn | |
Linode | Quantum |
Overview | |
Linode Object Storage is S3-compatible, highly available, and easily scalable storage for any of your backup, big data and data archiving needs. With Object Storage you do not need to have or use a Linode virtual machine to benefit from storing your files or expanding your capacity. | StorNext File System
|
Offer | |
Learn more about Linode Object Storage [EOL] | Learn more about Quantum ActiveScale |
Sample Customers | |
Configr | Information Not Available |
Linode Object Storage [EOL] is ranked 21st in File and Object Storage while Quantum ActiveScale is ranked 23rd in File and Object Storage. Linode Object Storage [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Quantum ActiveScale is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Linode Object Storage [EOL] is most compared with StackPath Object Storage, MinIO and Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas Quantum ActiveScale is most compared with .
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.