Compare Loadbalancer.org vs. Webscale Cloud Perform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It doesn't have the bonding capability feature. I would like to see the bonding capability feature included and it should be easier to upgrade. The capacity that we currently have is 2G. If we could… more »
Top Answer: We are using this solution for internet management. We have approximately eight incoming ISP lines. All of the ISP lines go to the load balancer. We use it for normal internet access.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,058
Comparisons
1,447
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
312
Rating
7.5
Views
42
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Webscale
Learn More
Overview

Loadbalancer.org leads the market in delivering high-performance load balancers and load balancing solutions to customers around the world. Customers who depend on the high-availability of business critical applications can take advantage of unparalleled versatility, affordable costs and instant access to the industry’s most responsive 24/7 support – even during a free trial. Founded in 2002, Loadbalancer.org has offices in the USA, Canada, Germany and headquarters in the UK. With thousands of physical, virtual & cloud-based appliances deployed across six continents, Loadbalancer.org ensures the uptime of e-commerce websites & mission critical applications globally, whilst also improving performance, security, scalability and providing a rapid return on investment (ROI). Loadbalancer.org offers a no-nonsense approach and complete focus on load balancing.

Webscale Cloud Perform is the cloud-native, SaaS-based application delivery controller (ADC) solution, that meets and exceeds the performance, availability and security demands of today’s web applications

Offer
Learn more about Loadbalancer.org
Learn more about Webscale Cloud Perform
Sample Customers
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
Retrofitsource.com, Skinit, Unilever
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government38%
Healthcare Company13%
Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government11%
Media Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise55%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Loadbalancer.org is ranked 15th in Application Delivery Controllers with 2 reviews while Webscale Cloud Perform is ranked 24th in Application Delivery Controllers. Loadbalancer.org is rated 7.6, while Webscale Cloud Perform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Stable internet management and access but the scalability needs improvement". On the other hand, Loadbalancer.org is most compared with HAProxy, Citrix ADC, Kemp LoadMaster, F5 BIG-IP and Fortinet FortiADC, whereas Webscale Cloud Perform is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.