We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare LoadUI Pro vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

More LoadUI Pro Pros »

"We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with.""The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter.""Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this.""This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market.""I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting.""The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pros »

Cons
"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

More LoadUI Pro Cons »

"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us.""The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools.""It's not that popular on the cloud.""Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled.""Micro Focus needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated.""The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved.""The reporting has room for improvement."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"They have a much more practical pricing model now.""The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year.""I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and… more »
Top Answer: The contract that we had with Micro Focus was a bit complex, but now it's much simpler. As a customer, I have clarity about it. That is something that helps us to serve the business better.
Top Answer: It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with… more »
Ranking
11th
Views
1,453
Comparisons
1,164
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
581
Rating
9.0
Views
5,179
Comparisons
3,936
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,009
Rating
7.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
LoadUI NG Pro
Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
Learn More
Overview

Speed is just as important as accuracy when it comes to APIs. A slow API can grind the user experience to a halt, but you don't have to wait for things to go live before understanding how they will behave under heavy load.

With LoadUI Pro, you can reuse your functional API tests built on the industry's #1 open-source based API testing tool, SoapUI Pro to speed testing and reduce the time it takes you to deploy high performance REST and SOAP web services.

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

Offer
Learn more about LoadUI Pro
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise
Sample Customers
Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider21%
Insurance Company7%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Computer Software Company17%
Insurance Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise79%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LoadUI Pro is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 7 reviews. LoadUI Pro is rated 9.0, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of LoadUI Pro writes "Facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, and spike testing for the APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Full geographical coverage, integrates well with monitoring tools, granular project inspection capabilities". LoadUI Pro is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and BlazeMeter, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Silk Performer, Apache JMeter and ReadyAPI.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.