NAVEX One vs USU Valuemation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NAVEX Logo
228 views|202 comparisons
USU Logo
482 views|337 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NAVEX One and USU Valuemation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
228
Comparisons
202
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 49 in IT Asset Management
Views
482
Comparisons
337
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Lockpath Keylight
Valuemation
Learn More
NAVEX
Video Not Available
USU
Video Not Available
Overview
NAVEX. Building a safer, stronger, and sustainable future through intelligent risk management. We believe confidence in tomorrow begins with smart risk & compliance decisions today. With more than 13,000 customers worldwide, we offer the most comprehensive tools and support to help them better understand their risk and compliance health, and to manage their GRC program more simply and efficiently.

Our NAVEX One Platform offers solutions that are built on the world’s largest database of risk intelligence information. It enables organizations to create more effective and efficient governance, risk, compliance and ESG programs. NAVEX One provides the holistic view of risk, automated processes, and insights needed to promote strong cultures, protect against unwanted risk and preserve the environment through sustainable practices.

With Valuemation you can choose which modules you want to start with. Additional modules can be added at any time if required.

The Valuemation Suite not only covers the usual ITSM processes, but also offers advanced modules – e. g. for software license management, IT financial management, infrastructure and business service monitoring, customer relationship management, innovation management, IT analytics, etc.

In addition, Valuemation can also be used at any time in other service areas and thus as a central tool for Enterprise Service Management throughout the company.

Sample Customers
Claims Recovery Financial Services (CRFS), Surescript, The University of Chicago
Alphapay AG, Atos IT Services GmbH, AVISTA Corp., Axians ICT Austria GmbH, BMW AG, Bilfinger SE, DataGROUP AG, Deutsche Telekom Technik GmbH, FIDUCIA IT AG, GISA GmbH, Heraeus Infosystems GmbH, Jungheinrich AG, mod IT GmbH, MTU Aero Engines GmbH, Silhouette International Schmied AG, soffico GmbH, Swiss POST CH AG, Viessmann IT Service GmbH, voestalpine AG
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise74%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NAVEX One is ranked 28th in GRC while USU Valuemation is ranked 22nd in IT Asset Management. NAVEX One is rated 0.0, while USU Valuemation is rated 0.0. On the other hand, NAVEX One is most compared with OneTrust GRC and ServiceNow, whereas USU Valuemation is most compared with ServiceNow.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.