We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution.""From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more.""The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect.""The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect.""The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly.""Technical support is very helpful.""The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pros »

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

More ThreatQ Pros »

Cons
"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly.""There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring.""There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS.""The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved.""Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses.""Sometimes agents hang. We have to reinstall the agents.""There should be more insights and completeness into the cyber kill chain, similar to CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. It just seems a little outdated in being 100% signature-based without all of the insights and protections that come with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. Overall, they've got some catching up to do if they plan to compete in the comprehensive EDR space."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Cons »

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

More ThreatQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage.
Top Answer: It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well.
Top Answer: There should be more insights and completeness into the cyber kill chain, similar to CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. It just seems a little outdated in being 100% signature-based without all of the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
3,582
Comparisons
2,087
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.7
Views
1,294
Comparisons
897
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator
Learn More
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider23%
Recruiting/Hr Firm15%
Financial Services Firm15%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 5th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 7 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 7.8, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Great graphical interface, good log events, and a simple setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with McAfee MVISION ePO, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Splunk Phantom, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Recorded Future, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, IntSights and EclecticIQ.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.