Compare Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. PTC Integrity

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is ranked 4th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 12 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is rated 8.4, while PTC Integrity is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM Octane and TFS, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS. See our Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. PTC Integrity report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsBy using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.From reporting to team management, everything is better now.The AI and functionality interface are useful.It has a good response time.The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed.This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too.It provides visibility on release status and readiness.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.Complete traceability as per process requirements.We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.

Read more »

Cons
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.We would like to have support for agile development.ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach.Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution.There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic.It needs Pure-FTPd WebUI and single sign-on.The QA needs improvement.

Read more »

We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.We have divided our licenses between Micro Focus ALM and ALM Octane. It works for us.It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
24,032
Comparisons
14,385
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
262
Avg. Rating
8.4
Views
1,992
Comparisons
1,454
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
423
Avg. Rating
6.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALMMKS
Learn
Micro Focus
PTC
Overview

Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management software (ALM), is a unified platform that helps teams prioritize, align and focus their project activities, provides actionable insight, and fosters the re-use of assets from requirements through development, testing, and readiness for delivery. 

Built on best practices, an extensible architecture and centralized repository, Micro Focus ALM is one of the first unified, technology-agnostic application management systems available now; integrating out-of-the-box with over 30 open source and competitive industry products.

Micro Focus’s ALM suite provides flexible solutions and deployment options to meet your needs and scale with you as you grow.

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Sample Customers
Specsavers, Cardinal Health, KMD, TurkcellTRW Automotive
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company50%
Manufacturing Company25%
Engineering Company13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Transportation Company17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Comms Service Provider9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise93%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.