Compare Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. TFS

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is ranked 5th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 14 reviews while TFS is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 8 reviews. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Facilitates team collaboration and integrates well with other tools". Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM Octane and TFS, whereas TFS is most compared with JIRA, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. See our Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. TFS report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
TFS Logo
Read 8 TFS reviews.
27,869 views|23,447 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsBy using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.From reporting to team management, everything is better now.The AI and functionality interface are useful.It has a good response time.It improved productivity and increased levels of internal data security.The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed.This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too.

Read more »

This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile.I like the build management features and the integration with Jenkins and many other tools.I like the Kanban board. It is very useful in terms of seeing who is working on what and what the current status of work is.It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code.From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc.The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field.It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use.

Read more »

Cons
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.We would like to have support for agile development.ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach.Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution.They should focus on giving greater value to the IoT and social networks.There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic.It needs Pure-FTPd WebUI and single sign-on.The QA needs improvement.

Read more »

The test management interface is not very handy.One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management.In the next release, I would like them to include integration for various projects, similar to what JIRA has, and they could create this feature on the dashboard.The dashboard needs more enhancements.More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively.Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization.We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.We have divided our licenses between Micro Focus ALM and ALM Octane. It works for us.It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ​It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.

Read more »

It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
19,479
Comparisons
10,885
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
166
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
27,869
Comparisons
23,447
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
275
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Also Known As
HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALMTeam Foundation Server
Learn
Micro Focus
Microsoft
Overview

Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management software (ALM), is a unified platform that helps teams prioritize, align and focus their project activities, provides actionable insight, and fosters the re-use of assets from requirements through development, testing, and readiness for delivery. 

Built on best practices, an extensible architecture and centralized repository, Micro Focus ALM is one of the first unified, technology-agnostic application management systems available now; integrating out-of-the-box with over 30 open source and competitive industry products.

Micro Focus’s ALM suite provides flexible solutions and deployment options to meet your needs and scale with you as you grow.

Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center
Learn more about TFS
Sample Customers
Specsavers, Cardinal Health, KMD, TurkcellVendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider14%
Healthcare Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm9%
Comms Service Provider8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm43%
Software R&D Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Retailer9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise93%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise66%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise87%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.