Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. Micro Focus UFT Mobile

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 10 reviews while Micro Focus UFT Mobile is ranked 5th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is rated 8.2, while Micro Focus UFT Mobile is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional writes "Good synchronization capabilities but pilot processing needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Mobile writes "Enables users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators". Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is most compared with LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Micro Focus UFT Mobile is most compared with Appium, Experitest SeeTest and Perfecto Mobile. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. Micro Focus UFT Mobile report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus UFT Mobile? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. Micro Focus UFT Mobile and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The reporting mechanism is a valuable feature that generates good reports.I think that analytics is very good and that the analytics features are very powerful.I like the user interface. I like the way we can divide our scenarios and can tune them. The integration with the quality center is great. These features are really good.The load testing, reporting, and scripting features are all valuable features.The solution is quite stable.The initial setup and installation of the software were very easy and straightforward.The Analysis feature makes it easy to analyze cross-data and we can pin to the focus period.Very useful for finding out how the system responds to load, stress, and normal situations, as well as benchmarking with other industry competitors. It also improved our response time, memory delegation, and CPU delegation. In addition, we used LoadRunner to optimize our database and website.

Read more »

The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization.The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare.It is a complete solution for mobile application testing.

Read more »

Cons
The debugging capability should be improved.I would like to have better support for adding more users per load generator.The solution uses a lot of memory and then it dies. It's difficult to work with the solution sometimes when you run a scenario it dies. They need to make the solution lighter somehow.The solution needs to reduce its pricing. Right now, it's quite expensive.I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients.Sometimes we are not be able to click on some of the buttons due to the screen mismatching and compatibility issues.The price of this solution should be cheaper.There is room for improvement of the pilot processing, the dump analysis, and forwarding results based on the dump analysis. We have a generator, root controller, different agents, and an analyzer, so all of these are very important when it comes to LoadRunner.

Read more »

I would like to see more integration with automation tools.We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it.The documentation and user interface both need improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing fees are based on the number of users.I don't know the licensing cost, but I think that you would get a discount for normal usage. I think there are different yearly options for different types of usage. It is not only how many users, but also whether it is shareable or not and other criteria involved in each feature. There are additional fees for the users and hardware linked to the processing.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
16,860
Comparisons
12,132
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
452
Avg. Rating
8.1
5th
Views
2,077
Comparisons
1,117
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
446
Avg. Rating
6.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunnerMobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

LoadRunner is the Micro Focus industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner stresses your entire system to isolate and identify potential client, network, and server bottlenecks, supporting performance testing of new technologies together with your existing, legacy applications.

Micro Focus Mobile Center software is the single gateway that enables you to redefine the mobile experience by delivering a predictable and repeatable mechanism for testing, monitoring, and improving any mobile app throughout its lifecycle using real-devices and emulators. The solution is designed to allow customers to deliver high-quality mobile applications and ensure a consistent, positive user experience under any circumstance. Micro Focus Mobile Center provides seamless integration with the testing components of Micro Focus' Application Delivery Management suite, and with Appium and Selenium. it is designed to support Continuous testing and Continuous integrations frameworks. This allowing customers to extend existing mobile investments without having to re-skill their teams or reengineer the backend. The solution covers all aspects of the mobile app lifecycle including manual, functional, performance, and security testing under real-world network conditions, include proactive monitoring, Mobile analytics and user sentiment analysis. Any device can now be managed and used throughout the app lifecycle to assess user experience before any issues impact the user.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Mobile
Sample Customers
JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin MediaJohn Lewis, NBrIX, HPE Technology Services, Neosecure, FEMSA CSC, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company25%
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider15%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company47%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company6%
Government6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. Micro Focus UFT Mobile and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.