2016-07-28T09:29:00Z

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
44 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I would like to see more integration with automation tools. The integration and configuration should be made easier with tools on the same platform.

2019-10-06T16:38:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I think the interface is not good very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn. Also the time it takes to connect the mobile and the interface is not up to speed. I think that there are other ways the product could be configured to detect devices more quickly in order to speed up use. When I connect my device to evaluate it can take a few minutes to see the device on my computer. I want to see better documentation because it was not so good in the last version. It needs a better explanation for implementing everything in Mobile Center. In the beginning, I had constant problems to connect Mobile Center because I could not find a good explanation to document Mobile Center working with EFT (Unified Functional Testing). I think that you cannot do this job without that kind of product support.

2019-08-05T06:23:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it. Right now, the way that we're managing it is we're requiring no clients are able to access it, so if we do happen to see something that belongs to another project, it's not a big deal. But true segregation of devices and apps, packaged apps, that have been uploaded to the tool, is something that is important to us. It's not there right now.

2017-09-19T09:33:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

I try to find the backs and try to pull the future and quality of the development. For me, it's a great idea, but the tool is not finished now.

2016-07-28T09:29:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.