We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Block Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a valuable gearing feature."
"This is a very robust and flexible solution."
"We use Microsoft Azure Block Storage to store, upload and download data. We can also use it as a backup."
"Microsoft Azure Block Storage is an easy-to-use tool as it has a lot of APIs and libraries, making it a very easy product to get started with for a user."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the ease with which you connect and use it."
"The most important reason we use Azure Block Storage is the ability to store large files. When we were building the solution, we knew we needed to store images and video files that are 100 MBs or more. The second thing is speed when dealing with such large file sizes."
"Data is securely stored."
"Microsoft Azure Block Storage has the same features as other solutions, but I like that its implementation process is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"There have been problems with integration, but it's getting better."
"The security is poor, and the sharing model is confusing, conceptually. I'd prefer not to use it. I'd like a user-friendly web interface and a better security model."
"We have not had the best experience with customer service and support."
"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"They could create more readability of files."
"Customer support could be improved, it can be difficult getting appropriate support."
"The solution could have better archival policies and localization of data."
"If the documentation could be improved then it would be very good. Right now, if you face a question, you have to guess how it works or you have to test your hypothesis."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could be improved."
More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Block Storage is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 56 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure Block Storage is rated 8.0, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Block Storage writes "Straightforward to set up and reliable with good features on offer". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Microsoft Azure Block Storage is most compared with Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), Rackspace Cloud Block Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Azure NetApp Files and Zadara, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. See our Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.