We performed a comparison between Microsoft Intune and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management)."If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"A valuable feature is user enrollment, where users can enroll their devices in their organizations themselves."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"It is quite policy-enabled, so you can build pretty much any policy to manage remote endpoints."
"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"The aspects I find most valuable are the managing the data and applications. I can also restrict the users to install any applications. I can also wipe the data if the phone was missplaced or stolen. These are the basics for me."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"For our office workers who are not based in Norway, when we order the PC, we can do some of the settings for them. These are standardized settings. We can set them up exactly as they are in Norway so that they're the same."
"Intuitive and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"The vulnerability management feature is what I used the most. It is a good SaaS product. It is easy to use. It has a nice UI where you can see all the assets and vulnerabilities."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"The reporting is fine."
"The Vulnerability Management and Patch Management features are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see some kind of analytics report."
"Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with."
"In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Apple products."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"It's the granularity: 'Is your firewall on? Is BitLocker on?' It's not amazing granularity. But I've looked into other products, like Duo, and they're all similar."
"There is room for improvement, particularly in terms of compatibility, extending beyond the well-known major brands."
"It would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure."
"Finding things in management can be quite difficult."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"There seems to be a lack of easy onboarding into Qualys."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."
"It's not very user-friendly at times and requires in-depth understanding. So, a layman or someone new to Qualys won't be able to easily understand it. You need education to use the solution."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 164 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Lansweeper.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
