Compare Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. SCCM

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 6th in Patch Management with 6 reviews while SCCM is ranked 2nd in Patch Management with 14 reviews. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 5.8, while SCCM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "While this product is versatile, the challenges of competing against capable open-source solutions make it less desirable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "Enables us to set up schedules, according to security needs, to automate server and desktop patching". Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with GFI LanGuard and Quest KACE Systems Management, whereas SCCM is most compared with BigFix, Ansible and Quest KACE Systems Management. See our Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. SCCM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. SCCM and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the decreased level of internet usage by my network.With WSUS, you can automatically install and distribute Microsoft security patches without using an internet connection for all clients and servers. It is not difficult to understand how it works and I think it's a very nice tool.This solution is stable.The interface is easy to use.The solution has great potential and leaves the user with almost limitless possibilities. It is truly a product with a million uses.It provides central management interface for deployment.

Read more »

The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging.The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching.This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD.This has made the management of our environment easier.This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system.The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur.It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well.It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see support for other operating systems such as Linux.Microsoft should improve their support for the product. A lot of guys are installing their products, especially Xero. If you have a real problem, though, it's quite difficult to find someone who you can support you.In the next release, I would like to see additional tools added to fix the engine issues on the client's side.The old backup files created by this solution use up a lot of storage, and this needs to be improved.Because you have to pay for the product and there may be other good free solutions, this may not be the best choice for a cost-minded organization.The ability to have more fine control within this solution is very important. It is not available for the solution in its current state.

Read more »

The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool.The cost of the product can be improved.This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems.Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell.This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections.I would like to see an agentless version of the solution.The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution.Our company would prefer not rebooting computers while people are using them. There seems to be no strategy behind it.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The WSUS cost is included in Microsoft Windows, and there are no licensing fees.The integration is included in the Windows Server system, and there are no additional fees.Because it is not open-source, it has to compete with open-source solutions. Relatively it is expensive to open-source.

Read more »

The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free.Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it.Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 17 in Patch Management
Views
271
Comparisons
80
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
425
Avg. Rating
5.8
2nd
out of 17 in Patch Management
Views
40,033
Comparisons
27,430
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
482
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Also Known As
Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft WSUS, WSUS, Microsoft Software Update Services, Software Update Services, Microsoft SUS, SUSSystem Center Configuration Manager
Learn
Microsoft
Microsoft
Overview

Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) enables information technology administrators to deploy the latest Microsoft product updates. You can use WSUS to fully manage the distribution of updates that are released through Microsoft Update to computers on your network. This topic provides an overview of this server role and more information about how to deploy and maintain WSUS.

With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.
Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
Learn more about SCCM
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company13%
Media Company13%
International Affairs Institute13%
Insurance Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government6%
Retailer6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise52%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. SCCM and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.