We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The solution's most important aspect is its seamless database."
"The solution is user-friendly with a good object retrieval feature."
"MongoDB is easy to use."
"It has visible benefits, actually, in terms of price of ownership if you compare it to, for example, Oracle."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"Its flexibility, and cost. It is reasonably priced."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the NoSQL database. In a SQL database, we need to join data together with a unique ID amongst other things, but in MongoDB, it's not required. We can directly receive all the information. The performance is very good. Additionally, they have frequent updates."
"It can handle a lot of files quickly."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"MongoDB is a very useful and convenient choice, but sometimes for more complex projects, there are certain niche requirements that appear, so using a different tool could be beneficial. It raises the complexity of the architecture, but it could be beneficial to the world, the features, the ease of the features which are being implemented."
"The on-premises version of the solution is still pretty expensive, especially compared to the cloud version."
"There is a need for improvement in MongoDB's customer support."
"From my point of view, they need a totally free IDE to work at high levels."
"The auto transaction feature is something that I found a little bit problematic. If we want to run two or three transactions at a time, we get write conflicts. So, it becomes really difficult when concurrency comes into the picture."
"It would help if MongoDB offered a light solution for small projects."
"There can be stability issues."
"People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Oracle NoSQL and Red Hat Data Grid, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with Cassandra, Accumulo, SingleStore, ScyllaDB and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.