We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The most valuable feature is the speed of MongoDB."
"Easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."
"We find the query and speed very valuable."
"I like the schemaless architecture that it follows. I also like the sharding that it provides."
"I find the integration with other tools very easy."
"MongoDB is simpler to learn and implement than traditional SQL solutions like MySQL."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the NoSQL database. In a SQL database, we need to join data together with a unique ID amongst other things, but in MongoDB, it's not required. We can directly receive all the information. The performance is very good. Additionally, they have frequent updates."
"Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool performs well."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"From my point of view, they need a totally free IDE to work at high levels."
"Data encryption is possible using third-party tools but they should have their own encryption capability built-in to this solution."
"There is a need for improvement in MongoDB's customer support."
"It isn't easy to recognize entities with MongoDB."
"Lacks sufficient scalability and elasticity."
"There are some problems with bugs appearing in sharding when the data is too high."
"The solution could have more integration."
"It would be good to have scalability for clusters. For example, if we have three clusters, we should be able to increase to five clusters if required. I am not sure if such a feature is currently there. I hope there is good documentation for this."
"The installation is difficult."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle Berkeley DB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB, Couchbase and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.