MongoDB vs. Oracle NoSQL Comparison

MongoDB

Oracle NoSQL

MongoDB

Read 15 MongoDB reviews.

4,257 views|3,428 comparisons

Oracle NoSQL

Read 1 Oracle NoSQL review.

1,191 views|1,003 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Anonymous User

Data Engineer | Full Stack Developer at a tech services company

Researched Oracle NoSQL but chose MongoDB: A stable solution with schemaless architecture and sharding feature

Use Oracle NoSQL? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Cloudera, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: December 2020.

Download now

455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability.""We haven't had any issues with stability.""It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings.""We can define security rules at the database level or the cluster level to grant or deny access to particular users.""The community is great if you have problem.""MongoDB is extremely developer-friendly because when you are starting, there is very little time needed upfront in terms of planning.""I find the integration with other tools very easy.""The most valuable feature is the geometric information done with GeoJSON." More MongoDB Pros »	"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability." More Oracle NoSQL Pros »
Cons
"More stable indexes would be helpful in a future release. That's been an issue for some time. I don't know if it's been fixed now but we transitioned to it because we needed a search index to be able to search for things and if that goes or starts disappearing, we have to move away from that solution. I don't know if they fixed it, last time I had this issue was three years ago so they might have solved it.""We find it difficult to incorporate MongoDB in some projects.""The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time.""Data encryption is possible using third-party tools but they should have their own encryption capability built-in to this solution.""You need integration with other tools to run the query in MongoDB.""MongoDB should not be used for reporting, analytics, or number-crunching tasks.""Simplifying the aggregation framework would be an improvement.""There should be better integration with other databases." More MongoDB Cons »	"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work." More Oracle NoSQL Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB.""It is rather expensive.""MongoDB is an open-source solution.""This is an open-source solution.""We use the open-source version, which is available to use free of charge.""I don't know, but I have heard from people who procure it that it is much cheaper than Oracle." More MongoDB Pricing and Cost Advice »	"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost." More Oracle NoSQL Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Which is the best RDMBS solution for big data? Top Answer: SQreamDB is a GPU DB. It is not suitable for real-time oltp of course. Cassandra is best suited for OLTP database use cases, when you need a scalable database (instead of SQL server, Postgres)… more » Read all 4 answers What do you like most about MongoDB? Top Answer: MongoDB has a simple data-loading interface. Read all 10 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB? Top Answer: This is an open-source solution. Read all 4 answers	Ask a question Earn 20 points
Ranking
1st out of 16 in NoSQL Databases Views 4,257 Comparisons 3,428 Reviews 14 Average Words per Review 595 Rating 8.0	7th out of 16 in NoSQL Databases Views 1,191 Comparisons 1,003 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 1,124 Rating 8.0
Popular Comparisons
InfluxDB vs. MongoDB Compared 24% of the time. Scylla vs. MongoDB Compared 12% of the time. Couchbase vs. MongoDB Compared 8% of the time. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MongoDB Compared 5% of the time. CouchDB vs. MongoDB Compared 4% of the time. See more MongoDB competitors » + Add more products to compare	Cassandra vs. Oracle NoSQL Compared 17% of the time. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. Oracle NoSQL Compared 11% of the time. InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL Compared 9% of the time. Neo4j vs. Oracle NoSQL Compared 8% of the time. Couchbase vs. Oracle NoSQL Compared 8% of the time. See more Oracle NoSQL competitors » + Add more products to compare
Learn
MongoDB	Oracle
Overview
Open source database alternative to relational databases. It simplifies development and is extremely scalable.	The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development. The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction. For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com
Offer
Learn more about MongoDB Learn More	Learn more about Oracle NoSQL Learn More
Sample Customers
Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google	Airbus, Globacom, WebAction
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm38% Legal Firm13% Energy/Utilities Company13% Outsourcing Company13% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Comms Service Provider25% Computer Software Company24% Financial Services Firm7% Energy/Utilities Company6%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company32% Comms Service Provider17% Financial Services Firm14% Educational Organization11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business41% Midsize Enterprise6% Large Enterprise53%	No Data Available

MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 15 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review. MongoDB is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Good security, highly-available when installed in a cluster, and no schema is needed to store data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "Proper dimensioning is the key to success with this solid performer". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Scylla, Couchbase, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and CouchDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with Cassandra, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, InfluxDB, Neo4j and Couchbase.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare MongoDB vs. Oracle NoSQL