Anypoint MQ vs VMware RabbitMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MuleSoft Logo
5,451 views|3,533 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
6,393 views|5,554 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anypoint MQ and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Anypoint MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load.""We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful.""Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types.""The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components.""The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good.""Good interface, simple to use and stable.""Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk.""The use of ACK is valuable."

More Anypoint MQ Pros →

"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room.""RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs.""It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture.""Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements""The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent.""The security is great.""It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily.""The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros →

Cons
"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more.""It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved.""Information on monitoring could be improved.""Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface.""The product does not provide a priority level for the message.""When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward.""The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved.""There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."

More Anypoint MQ Cons →

"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues.""The user interface could be improved.""RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux.""The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers.""The product is pretty hard to configure.""We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud.""The availability could be better.""The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"
  • "Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."
  • "The solution has a high price."
  • "The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."
  • More Anypoint MQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • "are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
  • "The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
  • "The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
  • "It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
  • "It is an open-source product."
  • More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product does not provide a priority level for the message. It also does not have Topic. It has an exchange instead of Topic. The users request for the Topic functionality. Such functionalities are… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is used in many projects. I'm an IT consultant. I use the tool when there's a need for asynchronous messaging.
    Top Answer:IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocols… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,451
    Comparisons
    3,533
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    6.8
    Views
    6,393
    Comparisons
    5,554
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    ActiveMQ logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    Apache Kafka logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Amazon SQS logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    IBM MQ logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    PubSub+ Event Broker logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Mule MQ
    RabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    Anypoint MQ is an enterprise multi-tenant, cloud messaging service that performs advanced asynchronous messaging scenarios between applications. Anypoint MQ is fully integrated with Anypoint Platform, offering role based access control, client application management, and connectors.

    Anypoint MQ supports hybrid use cases, IoT where you collect data from different devices, and a REST API you can use with device applications. You can also use Anypoint MQ with other application frameworks such as node.js, to communicate to queues.

    RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.

    Sample Customers
    State of Colorado, PacificComp, Panviva
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Retailer17%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Anypoint MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anypoint MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 39 reviews. Anypoint MQ is rated 7.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Amazon SQS, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and PubSub+ Event Broker. See our Anypoint MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.