We performed a comparison between N-able Take Control and TeamViewer Pilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
"Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
"The location markings can appear incorrectly."
"It's quite power-hungry and some customers complain that it drains the batteries on their smartphones very quickly."
Earn 20 points
N-able Take Control is ranked 19th in Remote Access with 2 reviews while TeamViewer Pilot is ranked 28th in Remote Access. N-able Take Control is rated 9.0, while TeamViewer Pilot is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of N-able Take Control writes "Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Pilot writes "Good tech support ". N-able Take Control is most compared with TeamViewer, Dameware Remote Support and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas TeamViewer Pilot is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor and TeamViewer.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
