NetIQ Access Manager vs P2 Security maXecurity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
83 views|56 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
P2 Security Logo
18 views|5 comparisons
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of the solution is average."
  • More NetIQ Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication.
    Top Answer:The number of legacy applications and classifications has room for improvement. Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more… more »
    Top Answer:I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    83
    Comparisons
    56
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    842
    Rating
    8.5
    9th
    Views
    18
    Comparisons
    5
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    maXecurity
    Learn More
    P2 Security
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.
    The maXecurity products are appliance-based solutions that offer a new and fundamentally different approach to Web Access Management (WAM). The maXecurity products slash initial and recurring costs, making effective and secure WAM practical for organizations of all sizes.
    Sample Customers
    Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology
    QTel Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization12%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available

    NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 2nd in Web Access Management with 5 reviews while P2 Security maXecurity is ranked 9th in Web Access Management. NetIQ Access Manager is rated 8.0, while P2 Security maXecurity is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable". On the other hand, NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Auth0 and Symantec Siteminder, whereas P2 Security maXecurity is most compared with .

    See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.