We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 53rd in Business Process Management (BPM). Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Nintex Process Platform vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.