We performed a comparison between Nutanix Unified Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."My opinion is that this solution has very good stability."
"The solution is easy to use, share, and manage."
"The Nutanix block files are the most valuable feature."
"The inclusion of it in the Nutanix Objects Storage platform simplifies my process as I am no longer required to acquire a separate platform. Instead, I can simply purchase additional licenses as needed. All management can be performed from a single unified interface, making it a convenient and streamlined experience."
"They have well-documented best practices and the interface is good."
"Currently, the most valuable aspect of our Nutanix implementation is its file storage functionality."
"What I like most about Nutanix Files Storage is the way it makes copies of the data. The solution also has high availability, which is excellent. Another valuable feature of Nutanix Files Storage is self-service, so users won't have to depend on the IT team much."
"The solution is stable and extremely easy to calibrate."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"Allowing the use of the Gflag compromises the integrity of the Nutanix system and its established standards."
"What's missing in Nutanix Files Storage is the support for multiple intranets or VLANs on the same file from different networks and network devices."
"The documentation on the support site needs to be improved."
"It is challenging to configure access control settings."
"The current hardware is not as dense as it could be. In our deployment, we have 2 PB per site, and we have to have 24 nodes. That's a lot of cabling and network ports that we use up. More dense nodes would be better."
"We have some problems with Nutanix Unified Storage's support because they asked us to change our hardware."
"The interface could be improved."
"The GUI is not user-friendly for new users and has room for improvement."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The scalability could improve."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The scalability could be improved."
Nutanix Unified Storage is ranked 7th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 39 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Nutanix Unified Storage is rated 9.0, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Nutanix Unified Storage writes "Provides good performance, longer uptime, and an easy way to manage our data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Nutanix Unified Storage is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System). See our Nutanix Unified Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.