We performed a comparison between Nutanix Unified Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Nutanix Unified Storage are the unified dashboard and the ease of administration."
"My opinion is that this solution has very good stability."
"The solution is simple and robust."
"What I found to be the most valuable features were better performance and uptime."
"We can utilize mixed storage block-sized objects and combine various databases within a unified interface."
"The life cycle managers of the PCMs are very impressive, and I like them. They make our lives easy when managing patches and security updates when they come in. A life cycle manager helps to consolidate different vendors."
"Nutanix Volumes is a perfectly stable product."
"I like Nutanix Prism Central. The primary benefit is that we can manage everything from the same page."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The graphical user interface could provide more detail. It would be nice if we could click on the service and get some expanded definitions of them. When hiring new people, it's difficult to teach them how everything works, but if they can access everything, they can teach themselves."
"The management is pretty clunky, in my opinion. It could be a little bit better."
"The documentation on the support site needs to be improved."
"We have some problems with Nutanix Unified Storage's support because they asked us to change our hardware."
"Nutanix should improve the one-click upgrade. There are a lot of dependencies on third-party licenses and HP hardware we use internally. The one-click upgrade fails sometimes."
"The feature request I have is for the consistent improvement of how user account permissions are assigned in Nutanix Unified Storage."
"The GUI is not user-friendly for new users and has room for improvement."
"We have issues with software updates occasionally."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
Nutanix Unified Storage is ranked 7th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 39 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Nutanix Unified Storage is rated 9.0, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Nutanix Unified Storage writes "Provides good performance, longer uptime, and an easy way to manage our data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Nutanix Unified Storage is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System). See our Nutanix Unified Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.